From Fusion Data Company · Free surface scan + agent-ready fixes · Open source (MIT)

Your AI built the easy 80%. We finish the 20% that ships broken.

Your builder nails the happy path, then swears it’s done. The other 20% — broken access control, unguarded admin APIs, 500s on bad input, secrets in the bundle — is where every AI build quietly fails. 80/20 Launch Audit is the senior developer that breaks into your app, proves what’s broken with evidence, and refuses to call anything done on a hunch. It runs inside your own Claude Code, Cursor, or Codex — your code never leaves your machine.

Proven on a fixture with 5 planted bugs — caught all 5.

▶ The real dashboard — a live audit with evidence for every check.

Free · 10 seconds · no install

Grade your app right now

Paste your live URL. We run the checks the free tools skip — Supabase / Firebase rules read with your own public key, API keys leaked in the bundle, admin routes open without auth, Stripe test keys in production, dev builds shipped by mistake — plus headers, cookies, CORS, HTTPS and SEO. Every finding comes with a paste-ready fix for Claude Code or Cursor. No signup, no code upload; only the URL leaves your browser.

Two different jobs

The free scan reads the skin. The deep audit opens the patient.

They are not the same product at two prices. The free surface scan asks every question that can be answered from outside your app, from one HTTP conversation. The deep audit runs inside your agent, drives a real browser, logs in as two different people, and tries to cross the line between them. One is a look. The other is a break-in.

Left: a hollow shell lit only where a single scanning beam touches it. Right: the same object cut open, every internal layer mapped and measured.
Left, the surface scan: one pass over the outer skin. Right, the deep audit: every internal layer instrumented.
Free surface scan · from outside · ~10s

What one HTTP conversation can prove

No install, no code, no login. Only the URL leaves your browser.

  • Supabase and Firebase rules, read with your own public anon key — the CVE-2025-48757 class
  • API keys and service-role secrets shipped into the JavaScript bundle
  • Admin routes answering an unauthenticated request (SPA shells honestly downgraded, never over-claimed)
  • Stripe test keys live in production, dev builds and public source maps shipped by mistake
  • Security headers, cookie flags, CORS, TLS and certificate expiry
  • SEO basics, broken links, placeholder copy left in the page
Deep audit · in your agent · free and MIT

What only a real break-in can prove

Chromium plus raw HTTP, driven from your own machine on your own agent subscription.

  • Broken access control: change one id and read another user’s row — attempted, not inferred
  • Privilege gradient: log in as two identities and try to cross between them
  • Write authorization and mass assignment on the endpoints your UI hides but your server still answers
  • Malformed input into every handler, watching for a 500 with a stack trace attached
  • Real-viewport behaviour at 390px and 768px, WCAG 2.2 reflow, axe-core accessibility
  • Your repo: middleware map versus what the server actually enforces
  • The watchdog: every pass re-run against fresh evidence before it is allowed to count
0
sourced tests in the catalog
0
checks generated for the demo target
0
tests green in the engine’s own suite
0
planted bugs caught on the fixture
The deliverable, before you pay for it

This is the report.

Not a mock-up. This is a real run against fixtures/buggy-shop — the open-source test target in our own repo, whose five planted bugs are written down in BUGS.md before the audit ever runs. Every number below came out of the engine. It found all five, and it says out loud which checks it could not run.

http://127.0.0.1:4400 · buggy-shop

69 checks generated. 43 passed, 15 failed, 11 blocked for want of credentials, HTTPS or a lockfile — and blocked checks are reported as coverage gaps, never quietly counted as passes. Readiness is passed ÷ (passed + product bugs + needs‑verification): of the checks we could actually run, what fraction is launch‑ready.

7 critical 7 high 1 medium 8 needs verification 11 blocked
Severity Check What broke, and why it costs you Evidence
Critical TC-ADM-004 · roles_permissions Admin route blocks anonymous access: /admin/users/1A privileged surface answered an unauthenticated request. Server-side authorization is missing, not just UI-hidden. Expected a redirect, 401 or 403; got 200. HTTP 200
Critical TC-MUT-002 · mutation_authz Normal user denied privileged POST: /api/admin/delete-userSigned in as an ordinary user, the delete call succeeded. The button is gone from the UI; the action still fires for anyone who calls it directly. HTTP 200
Critical TC-OBJ-001 · object_authz No cross-user object access: /admin/users/1One id changed in the URL returned another person’s record, salary and SSN included. This is broken access control, tried and confirmed. HTTP 200
High TC-API-003 · api_contract Malformed input handled cleanly: POST /api/ordersA missing qty threw a TypeError and returned a raw stack trace in the response body. Your internals, handed to a stranger. HTTP 500
High TC-FE-009 · responsive_visual No horizontal overflow on phone (390px)Horizontal overflow detected in a real 390px viewport, three attempts, three failures — not a one-off flake. Playwright trace attached. 3 of 3
High TC-SEC-001 · security_headers Hardening headers carry safe values: /No CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options or HSTS on any response. The cheap defenses that quietly never got turned on. 0 of 4
Verify TC-TLS-001 · blocked TLS/HSTS checks apply to an https deploymentNot run, and said so: the target is plain http, so HSTS and the http→https redirect are not meaningful here. A blocked check is a coverage gap, never a pass.
Open a finished hosted report: fusiondataco.com → Grade your own app free The hosted report is a real run against our own site, with every finding and every paste-ready fix.
Don't want to run it yourself?

Order a hosted audit

The tool stays free and MIT: run the full deep audit in your own agent any time. If you would rather not, pick a tier below. Every tier runs the site-wide URL audit the moment you pay and delivers it three ways: on screen at a private link, as a PDF, and by email. Deep Audit and Pro add a person in a real browser. See a finished report first.

Secure checkout by Stripe, card or Link. We only ever touch the public URL you give us. If we cannot reach your site (bot wall, login wall, down), the order page says so and the run is refunded automatically. Prefer to keep it in-house? The same audit is free in your own agent: connect it above.

The part nobody else can offer

Your code never leaves your machine.

Every hosted scanner in this category needs your repository, or a login, or an agent installed on your infrastructure. The deep audit needs none of it, because it is not our software running on our servers — it is an MCP server running inside your Claude Code, Cursor or Codex, on your subscription, against a localhost URL if you like. We never see a file. There is no upload step to opt out of, because there is no upload.

A laptop enclosed in a shield. Every file and code block stays inside the shield; a single small marker leaves toward a distant cloud, and nothing comes back in.
Everything inside the shield stays on your machine. One thing leaves, and only if you ask for the hosted scan: the URL.

What actually crosses the wire

  • Deep audit, in your agent: nothing. Zero LLM calls from the engine, zero network calls to us. The host agent does the reasoning on your own subscription; the report is written to your disk.
  • Free surface scan: the URL you typed, and nothing else. No signup, no code, no repository access.
  • Hosted Single Run: the URL and the email you gave for the order. We fetch your public pages exactly the way a browser does.

The engine is MIT-licensed and the whole of it is on GitHub, so this is a claim you can read rather than one you have to believe. Check it.

Get started in one paste

Connect it to your agent

80/20 Launch Audit runs as an MCP server inside the coding agent you already pay for. No API key to buy, no hosted backend, nothing to deploy. Copy one line, paste it into your agent, done.

Install & connect

Pick your agent — the clone + install is identical; only the MCP registration differs.

1One command clones, installs, downloads Chromium, and registers 80/20 Launch Audit with Claude Code.

terminal — claude code
git clone https://github.com/Fusion-Data-Company/fusion-launchaudit.git && cd fusion-launchaudit && npm install && npx playwright install chromium && claude mcp add launchaudit -- node --experimental-strip-types ./runner/mcp-server.ts && npm run dashboard
Then just tell your agent: “audit my site at <url>”.
The stuff that ships broken

What it catches

Linters check syntax. 80/20 Launch Audit checks reality — the things AI builders confidently ship and quietly fake. It actively tries to break in, not just look around.

Broken access control (IDOR)

Change one id in the URL and read another user's data. We try it — and flag it when it works.

Admin hidden, not locked

The button is gone from the UI, but the action still fires for anyone who calls it directly.

Unguarded privileged API

A sensitive endpoint with no server-side authorization check — wide open behind a friendly form.

500 + stack leak on bad input

Send a malformed request and the server returns a 500 with an internal stack trace.

Missing security headers

No CSP, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS — the cheap defenses that quietly never got turned on.

Leaked secrets in the bundle

API keys or a stray .env shipped straight into the client bundle, readable by anyone.

Mobile layout overflow

Horizontal scroll and clipped content at 390px — checked in a real viewport, not guessed.

“Says it saved but didn't”

The success toast appears; the data never persists. We reload and verify it actually stuck.

Why this isn’t your AI

“Can’t I just ask my AI to check it?”

You already did — and it said it looked good. That’s the trap: your AI wants to help, so it tells you what you’re hoping to hear. It reads your own code and agrees with it. It won’t log in as a stranger to read your data, won’t hammer your API until it leaks, and never double-checks its own “looks fine.” 80/20 Launch Audit makes it do the opposite of people-pleasing.

It attacks — for real

A live browser plus raw HTTP. It logs in as two different users and tries to cross the line, sends the malformed input, and calls the admin endpoint it should never reach.

It proves everything

Every result carries evidence — a trace, a response, a screenshot. Not “looks fine.” Shown.

It can’t lie to you

A separate watchdog re-runs every “pass.” Anything it can’t reproduce is flagged — never quietly counted as done.

Your AI is the eager junior who says ship it. 80/20 Launch Audit is the senior who says prove it — and does.

See it in 15 seconds

Three takes, one message: free, local, and yours.

Real developers on why "your AI said it's done" isn't enough — and how 80/20 Launch Audit runs free, on your own machine and your own agent subscription.

The short version
Free, local, on your own subscription
A template you make your own
The receipts

“It looked done.” Here’s what that costs.

Not hypotheticals — documented incidents and studies. This is why “your AI said it’s ready” isn’t enough.

An AI agent deleted a live production database during a code freeze — then lied that it couldn’t be recovered.

The Register, 2025 · Replit / SaaStr incident

0% of AI-generated code fails security tests — and newer models are no better.

Veracode GenAI Code Security Report, 2025

One AI-built app leaked 0 API keys.

Wiz, 2026 · Moltbook

0 live AI-built apps were leaking users’ names, emails, and financial data.

Semafor · CVE-2025-48757 (Lovable)

Developers using AI write less secure code — but are more confident it’s secure.

Stanford, ACM CCS 2023

AI-written pull requests carry ~0.0× more bugs.

CodeRabbit, 2025 · 470 real GitHub PRs

Three steps

How it works

From a running URL to a scored, evidence-backed punch list — and then the fixes — without leaving your editor.

1

Connect it to your agent

One copy-paste registers 80/20 Launch Audit as an MCP server inside Claude Code, Cursor, or Codex — on your own subscription. Nothing to host.

2

Point it at your app

Give it a running URL and optionally the repo. It scans the code, crawls the app, and runs real browser interactions plus direct HTTP probes.

3

Get the score & the fixes

A 0–100 readiness score, evidence for every check, and paste-ready fixes — then it applies them and re-verifies that they actually work.

The Truth Protocol

No check passes without proof.

A watchdog independently re-verifies every single “pass” against fresh evidence — re-running the interaction, re-fetching the response, re-reading the state. Anything it can't reproduce is flagged, never silently passed. So the score you get is the truth, not a hopeful guess.

The 20% you cannot see from here

It is 1 a.m. and your agent says it is done.

It is not lying to you on purpose. It read your code, agreed with it, and never once logged in as a stranger to see what your app hands out. Somebody should do that before your first real user does.

Ship like a senior dev reviewed it.

Because one did. Connect 80/20 Launch Audit in under a minute and find out what's really between you and launch.

Get in touch

Questions, ideas, a check we should add?

Send anything — a question about the platform, a test you want in the default suite, feedback, or a partnership. It goes straight to Fusion.